I've got a little bone to pick with Hank. In this episode, he and Runkle engage in a threesome with a woman whom Hank had previously bedded. Hank can't remember why he didn't call her back until she gets close to orgasm on account of Runkle's laboured oral effort, for which he is rewarded with a dousing of female ejaculation. So that's why Hank ditched her!

My beef? What's so wrong about this natural phenomenon? Is it so disturbing or unpleasant that you wouldn't call a woman back over it? Women have been putting up with men's ejaculate forever!

It's quite the double standard if you ask me.
 
I think that men who say you don't like it are only threatened by it, as though only they can be the ejaculators in the relationship.

Fellas, I'd like to know: Would you not call a woman back over a natural female byproduct of pleasure? Don't hesitate to give an honest answer here -- we're all friends, aren't we?

Written by Angela Tosse

Hank's Ranks this week - close, but no cigar. The man engaged in the beginnings of sex but didn't really partake and quit due to a lack of mojo. And since I don't like him this week, we're not counting his demisex as a another notch on the bedpost.