Skip to Content  |  Skip to Footer

Rebirth of Bleak

Tuesday, January 09, 2007 4:00 PM

Clive Owen & Claire-Hope Ashitey in Children of MenChildren Of Men is, frighteningly, a movie for our times. Directed by Alfonso Cuaron and starring Clive Owen, this dystopian near-future flick is set in Britain in 2027, 18 years after the last child has been born (a reason for the demise of human fertility is never given). Most of the rest of the world has fallen into chaos and hordes of refugees from a world that has lost hope for its future are flooding the coasts of the UK.

But of course Britain hasn’t maintained order by good table manners alone; the same hard line government that enforces mandatory fertility tests for all citizens rounds up wayward refugees and dumps them in squalid camps for deportation and worse.

The action of the plot centres around Owen’s disenchanted activist character, Theo, being thrust into the role of protector and escort of the first pregnant woman in nearly two decades into the safety of underground research group, The Human Project. Owen’s rise from apathetic drunk to knight errant is ably supported by a stellar cast that includes Julianne Moore as a terrorist leader (and the mother of Theo’s deceased son) and Michael Caine as a spliff-tastic renegade hippie.

However, it is Cuaron’s usage of epic single shot action sequences, docu-style hand held photography and vivid production design that shades familiar UK scenery like Greater London or the English countryside with third world war zone details that truly transport the viewer into this chillingly possible near future scenario. Children of Men is based on the PD James novel of the same name, but, with it's infusion of present day plights, from forced human migration to religious fundamentalism, that Cuaron elevates his film beyond it's source material.  
Published by Goat Boy
Filed under: ,

Delicious Digg It FaceBook

Comments

Perley said:

I think that Y Tu Mama Tambien was sexier.

January 9, 2007 9:38 PM

Mia said:

Goat boy - great post and I must admit I'm feeling a little jealous that you're able to give Children of Men such a glowing (and intellegent, might I add) review. I'm a big fan of this genre, so rushed out to see it this weekend rife with anticipation. Bring it on, the bleaker the better! And hells yeah, it sure was bleak. No complaints there. Now, before I disagree with you, I must give respect where respect is due. Cuaron directs a visually stunning film from start to finish. Owen and the rest of the cast did a steller job. I especially loved Michael Cane's character with his forest hideaway and his crop of 'Strawberry Choke.' This movie definitely didn't skimp on visual details and I really loved that they didn't feel the need to explain every last detail (why the burning cows?) and dumb down the story for a wide-spread audience. Cudos to that, for sure. So what's my beef? Well, I haven't read the book and I came away from the film feeling like I probably should have done so before I saw it. Bummer. I felt like where they excelled in striking visuals, they failed in developing a strong and compelling story. You must admit, it was pretty base and predictable. Very stimulating for the eyes, not so much for the brain, you hear what I'm saying? I love the genre not just for the scary picture it paints of the potential future we all have in store, but for the political and social message that it should provide--allowing us to come away with an insight into what we, as a generation and society, are doing wrong right now. I felt like it didn't tell me or teach me anything new. Just my humble two-cents. I would definitely recommend the film to anyone and still consider it among the best I've seen this year. It let me down in a few ways, but truth be told, I probably just expected a little bit too much.

January 10, 2007 11:05 AM

Reggie The Vampire said:

Is or is not Harry Potter in this film?  Yes I realize that was a poorly worded sentence, as this one surely is too!

January 10, 2007 12:21 PM

cujo said:

I adore Cuaron and I loved Clive Owen in this film. Is he not the sexiest man alive? Unlike Mia I had no expectations going into the film so I enjoyed it. Although I thought he could have pushed the storyline a bit further.

January 10, 2007 4:29 PM

Goat Boy said:

Mia...you are the one who told me to read Oryx & Crake by Marge Atwood, so it is clear that your wisdom in this genre can not be doubted.

I suppose what i enjoyed about the story was it's lean, pared down approach. Admittedly, the journey of the two main characters was rather predictable, but somehow the director's attention to detail in establishing the hopeless world in the first half of the film...the rescued art in the refurbished Tate Modern for example...I felt like this film over-delivered in terms of delivering some real pathos.

January 10, 2007 4:44 PM

Sideshow- a Showcase blog said:

Pan was an ancient Greek god who was similar in stature to the Satyr...a small fellow with the upper

January 30, 2007 10:20 AM

Leave a Comment

Your comment will be moderated before posting
(required)  
(optional)
(required)  

Back to Top